David, I just tried on Windows and it seems that we are also all set there now thanks to Tony.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Douglas Bates <[email protected]> wrote: > Problem goes away when updating to latest master. Thanks Andreas. > > > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:33:49 PM UTC-5, Douglas Bates wrote: >> >> On Linux Pkg.test("Distribuitons") fails at >> >> From worker 2: testing Weibull(20.0, 1.0) >> From worker 2: testing Weibull(1.0, 2.0) >> From worker 2: testing Weibull(5.0, 2.0) >> From worker 2: >> ERROR: LoadError: On worker 3: >> LoadError: assertion failed: |cov(Xs,2) - cov(g)| <= 0.01 >> cov(Xs,2) = [1.55864 0.529817; 0.529817 4.52288] >> cov(g) = [1.5605 0.53; 0.53 4.508] >> difference = 0.014877712873417437 > 0.01 >> in test_approx_eq at ./test.jl:843 >> in test_mixture at >> /home/bates/.julia/v0.5/Distributions/test/mixture.jl:121 >> in include_string at ./loading.jl:380 >> in include_from_node1 at ./loading.jl:429 >> in #5 at /home/bates/.julia/v0.5/Distributions/test/runtests.jl:44 >> in #501 at ./multi.jl:1193 >> in run_work_thunk at ./multi.jl:844 >> in macro expansion at ./multi.jl:1193 [inlined] >> >> >> The problem seems to be reproducible. That is, it doesn't look like it >> is caused by an unfortunate set of values from an RNG. >> >> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 1:27:35 PM UTC-5, Andreas Noack wrote: >>> >>> DataFrames should as of now also work on 0.5 (on Mac and Linux) >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Noack <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry for not being clear. That was to Doug so it's only about Mac and >>>> Linux. I'm not up to date with the Windows issues. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:20 PM, David Anthoff <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You mean it should work on Win? How so? Distributions depends on >>>>> StatsFun, StatsFun depends on Rmath and Rmath doesn’t work on Windows. So >>>>> nothing precompiles and nothing can be used on Windows, right? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>>>> Behalf Of *Andreas Noack >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, July 18, 2016 11:17 AM >>>>> >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [julia-stats] Distributions/Rmath, >>>>> DataFrames/(NullableArrays,CategoricalArrays) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I haven't tagged Distributions yet so you'll have to checkout master. >>>>> I've just run the tests locally without errors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:57 PM, David Anthoff <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But note that everything is broken on Windows until Rmath.jl works on >>>>> Windows. Rmath was removed from Base last week without Rmath.jl being >>>>> ready >>>>> on Windows… >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Andreas Noack >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, July 18, 2016 10:46 AM >>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [julia-stats] Distributions/Rmath, >>>>> DataFrames/(NullableArrays,CategoricalArrays) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Distributions should work as of this morning. I think the only thing >>>>> left for DataFrames is to tag a version for Distributions so we should be >>>>> pretty close as that could be done now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Douglas Bates <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I know people are working hard on reconciling changes w.r.t. Rmath >>>>> split off as a package and the Distributions package, and converting >>>>> DataFrames to use CategoricalArrays and NullableArrays. I don't want to >>>>> cause anyone even more work to respond to repeated questions but it would >>>>> be handy to have an ETA on when DataFrames and Distributions will be able >>>>> to pass Pkg.test on version 0.5 and/or v0.4. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Also are there things other can do to help - reviewing and revising >>>>> documentation, reviewing and revising tests, etc.? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "julia-stats" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "julia-stats" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "julia-stats" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "julia-stats" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "julia-stats" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "julia-stats" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "julia-stats" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
