This announcement has been made on the Domains/Data category of the
new Discourse forum. Please go to there for questions and discussions:h
ttps://discourse.julialang.org/t/announcement-dataframes-0-9-0-planned-
for-february/266
Towards DataFrames 0.9.0The DataFrames package and the surrounding ecosystem
are currently
undergoing a deep refactoring in development branches, based on a
framework developed over the last two years. This work aims to
dramatically improve performance by replacing the DataArray type (and its NA
value representing missingness) with the new Nullable, NullableArray (see this
blog post) and CategoricalArray types. Please refer to this blog post for an
explanation of the limitations of the current design based on DataArray. The
new framework is planned to be released as version 0.9.0 in early February 2017.
New APIs and Compatibility BreaksDespite our efforts to preserve backward
compatibility, this change
will likely break some existing workflows. The standard indexing
approach (inherited from R) will no longer be the recommended interface.
Instead, convenient, flexible and efficient high-level APIs inspired by
the dplyr R package, by
SQL or by LINQ will be preferred. Users are encouraged to experiment
with these approaches even with the current stable DataFrames release
(0.8.x series), via the DataFramesMeta and Query packages. Eventually, an API
based on the StructuredQueries package (see this blog post),
which is still in development, will be provided. Among other
advantages, these high-level APIs will eventually support different data
sources, from in-memory data frames to out-of-core databases, with very
little code changes.
The new DataFrames release will require adjustments from all packages
depending on DataFrames. Until then, development will continue to
happen on the master branch of the git repository. In many
cases, both the new and the old frameworks can be supported in parallel
(by supporting both DataArray and NullableArray): when possible, package
authors are encouraged to start porting as soon as possible. The porting work
is tracked in a GitHub issue; take inspiration from existing pull requests, and
do not hesitate to ask for help there if needed.
Motivated users can also experiment with the development version,
though be warned that the user experience can currently be frustrating
due to incomplete support for Nullable in Julia and in high-level APIs. This
issue, known as "lifting" (see this discussion and this one, as well as linked
pages), still requires fundamental changes. We expect these to be complete by
early January 2017 to allow for a progressive migration; users are not advised
to upgrade to the development version for actual work until then.
More ChangesThe above changes will be coordinated with a related refactoring of
the DataFrames codebase to increase modularity and :
* CSV reading and writing support (readtable and writetable) will be
deprecated in favor of the CSV package. Data importation and exportation should
more generally be done via the DataStreams package (see this blog post).
* Functions translating model formulas into model matrices will be moved to a
separate StatsModels package, with the goal of eventually supporting any kind
of AbstractTable (including DataFrame),
and will also include model-related functions currently in StatsBase.
Though this will not happen in the first release, in the end modeling
packages should only need to depend on that package, and no longer on
DataFrames.
* A new AbstractTable interface will be progressively developed in the
eponymous package to allow writing generic code supporting any kind of tabular
data, including DataFrame, without depending on the DataFrames package.
* Packages strongly tied to DataFrames (including that package itself) will be
moved to the JuliaData organization to keep JuliaStats focused on actual
statistics.
We are aware that the transition will certainly be disruptive for
users. But we are confident the advantages of the new framework will
greatly offset its costs, following state-of-the-art designs like R's dplyr and
Python's Pandas 2.0, and taking full advantage of Julia's flexibility and
performance. Your help is welcome to push forward with this roadmap!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"julia-stats" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.