i couldn't find a way to increment those like an integer (which makes it 
difficult to generate all possible permutations).  andrew

On Monday, 30 December 2013 14:27:04 UTC-3, Kevin Squire wrote:
>
> There are BitArrays (and BitVectors). 
>
> Kevin
>
> On Monday, December 30, 2013, andrew cooke wrote:
>
>> right, or just loop through the existing types and check whether 
>> 8*sizeof() is large enough.
>>
>> i didn't find anything in base either.  the reason why o thought it 
>> should perhaps be added is because it requires knowledge of hat sizes are 
>> supported.
>>
>> andrew
>>
>> On Monday, 30 December 2013 12:24:20 UTC-3, John Myles White wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m still a little confused, but it sounds like Elliot’s suggestion was 
>>> right: iceil(log2(x)) will tell you how much bits are needed to represent 
>>> the value, so you’d need some function that wraps that calculation and then 
>>> finds the closest power of 2 to the output to determine the right storage 
>>> type. 
>>>
>>> I’m pretty sure that function doesn’t exist in Base. 
>>>
>>>  — John 
>>>
>>> On Dec 30, 2013, at 6:35 AM, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>>
>>> > 
>>> >     julia> smallest_uint(5) 
>>> >     Uint8 
>>> > 
>>> > so this isn't typeof() (which you might have been describing). 
>>> > 
>>> > i have code that needs to generate a table of values (bit fields, but 
>>> Vector{Bit} isn't so useful), but the number of the bits can vary. 
>>> > 
>>> > andrew 
>>> > 
>>> > On Monday, 30 December 2013 00:00:11 UTC-3, John Myles White wrote: 
>>> > I’m a little unsure what you mean. Are you asking for a function that 
>>> given a 32bit value returns that it’s of type Uint32? I would guess (but 
>>> maybe am way offbase) that you’ll be storing 30bit unsigned integers inside 
>>> of Uint32’s, right? 
>>> > 
>>> >  — John 
>>> > 
>>> > On Dec 29, 2013, at 7:45 PM, andrew cooke <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > > question says it all really.  if i need to deal with 30bit unsigned 
>>> integers, is there anything that returns Uint32? 
>>> > > 
>>> > > [obviously i can just tabulate what there is if missing, but i 
>>> wondered if it would also be good for the std lib.] 
>>> > > 
>>> > > thanks, andrew 
>>> > 
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to