Problem fixed by this commit:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/commit/648814fc83f06b5e73d18b58067f0e1a449c0b4b
Please check out the latest master and try.
Cheers,
Dahua
On Monday, January 6, 2014 9:34:57 PM UTC-6, Dahua Lin wrote:
>
> Oh, I see the problem -- ``zero(x)`` is not defined with ``x`` is of type
> normal.
>
> I will make a patch soon to allow this.
>
> - Dahua
>
> On Monday, January 6, 2014 9:29:37 PM UTC-6, Dahua Lin wrote:
>>
>> What is normal(u, v)?
>>
>> Julia base does not have such a function/type.
>>
>> - Dahua
>>
>> On Monday, January 6, 2014 4:52:21 PM UTC-6, Bernie Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> I've recently upgraded to v0.3.0 on my Ubuntu machine, but it seems that
>>> the sum() has a bug (the following code runs fine in 0.2.0).....
>>>
>>>
>>> [65]:
>>>
>>> type normal{T<:Float64}
>>>
>>> tau::T
>>>
>>> pi::T
>>>
>>> end
>>>
>>> In [73]:
>>>
>>> function +(g1::normal, g2::normal)
>>>
>>> return normal(g1.tau+g2.tau, g1.pi+g2.pi)
>>>
>>> end
>>>
>>> Out[73]:
>>>
>>> + (generic function with 110 methods)
>>>
>>> In [74]:
>>>
>>> sum([normal(0.0,1.0) for i=1:2])
>>>
>>> no method convert(Type{normal{Float64}}, Int64)
>>> while loading In[74], in expression starting on line 1
>>> in sum_seq at abstractarray.jl:1420
>>> in sum_pairwise at abstractarray.jl:1480
>>> in anonymous at no file
>>>
>>>
>>> In [76]:
>>>
>>> sum([normal(0.0,1.0) for i=1:3])
>>>
>>> no method convert(Type{normal{Float64}}, Int64)
>>> while loading In[76], in expression starting on line 1
>>> in sum_seq at abstractarray.jl:1420
>>> in sum_pairwise at abstractarray.jl:1480
>>> in anonymous at no file
>>>
>>>
>>> In [77]:
>>>
>>> sum([normal(0.0,1.0) for i=1:4])
>>>
>>> no method convert(Type{normal{Float64}}, Int64)
>>> while loading In[77], in expression starting on line 1
>>> in sum_seq at abstractarray.jl:1420
>>> in sum_pairwise at abstractarray.jl:1480
>>> in anonymous at no file
>>>
>>>
>>> In [78]:
>>>
>>> sum([normal(0.0,1.0) for i=1:5])
>>>
>>> Out[78]:
>>>
>>> normal{Float64}(0.0,5.0)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
