I noticed that you reported that the PDF generation fails on your computer, but i did not notice your references to pages in the online documentation, which I now see must indicate that you had downloaded the links I posted. Sorry for not reading carefully.
I was not sure that anyone would look into this issue, and if you just wanted to have a PDF for printing/reading, downloading might be a viable option. In my opinion this is a bug in Sphinx (or some dependency/version issue on your system), because Spinx does not give an error on our documentation, but generates invalid .tex files. kl. 12:37:55 UTC+1 tirsdag 7. januar 2014 skrev Marcus Urban følgende: > > You missed my point. It's not about wanting a PDF version of the > documentation. I know that I can download it, although I reiterate that the > PDF version online has tables on p. 114 and 116 that are essentially > unreadable. My point is that the build procedure for the documentation is > failing. > > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Ivar Nesje <[email protected] <javascript:> > > wrote: > >> If you just want a pdf of the documentation you can download it from >> https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/julia/latest/julia.pdf or >> https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/julia/release-0.2/julia.pdf >> >> Ivar >> >> kl. 10:14:58 UTC+1 tirsdag 7. januar 2014 skrev Marcus Urban følgende: >>> >>> Building the PDF version of the documentation fails for me. Following >>> the instructions in doc/README.md, "make helpdb.jl" and "make html" worked >>> without error. However, "make latexpdf" fails with the error >>> >>> ! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:你 not set up for use with >>> LaTeX. >>> >>> My LaTeX installation (MacTeX/TeX Live) works fine for everything else, >>> so I am not sure how to fix the problem. I see that there is a problem with >>> unicode characters. I was able to produce a PDF using xelatex, but I had to >>> hack on JuliaLanguage.tex manually, removing some options that were >>> incompatible with xelatex, adding a fake CJK* that is a no-op, and then >>> editing one instance of a tabular that xelatex sees as an error (p. 114 in >>> the online PDF). I also noticed that this table and one on p. 116 have >>> issues in the typesetting in the online PDF, so those tables seem to be an >>> issue either way. >>> >>> >
