The static compile branch was originally written against 0.2, and was merged shortly afterwords. It merges cleanly, modulo a comment I edited in both branches.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> wrote: > That seems like an unreasonable amount of work for someone to have to do for > a stablish post 0.2 branch. Honestly, the 0.3 branch has been pretty stable. > If you wanted to snapshot master right now, I think you'd be fine. > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Jameson Nash <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If you don't mind doing a bit of work, you could probably merge that >> pull request into your local 0.2 branch. >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Westley Hennigh >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > The work done towards static compilation >> > (https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/4898) is awesome, but I have to >> > work from a fairly stable build. Does anyone have a trusted sha from >> > after >> > 7a34a0dee422c78a7edf59a7e088ea0beb848f79 that I could build from until >> > the >> > next release is tagged? >> > >> > Thanks! > >
