Great. That is really nice. — John
On Jan 11, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope. This is one of the nice things about the design. > >> On Jan 11, 2014, at 8:16 PM, John Myles White <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I’ve noticed that a lot of people to use different field names when writing >> inner constructors, so that you see code like: >> >> type Foo >> a::Int >> >> function Foo(alpha::Int) >> magic(alpha) >> new(alpha) >> end >> end >> >> Would this ever be necessary to avoid confusion about names? I’ve started >> reusing the exact field name and it seems to work fine. Am I going to run >> into a subtle bug? >> >> — John >>
