Just to throw in my two cents, I don't think it's the right approach to brush off a class of performance optimizations that has a valid use case in practice and can lead to a 4x speedup. There should at least be *some* way to access nonpromoting integer operations, even if the default operators do promote.
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficiency vs C ... Eric Davies
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficiency ... Przemyslaw Szufel
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficie... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Jameson Nash
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Andy M
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational... Tobias Knopp
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computati... Milan Bouchet-Valat
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia comp... Tobias Knopp
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computati... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Miles Lubin
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computati... John Myles White
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia comp... Steven G. Johnson
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia ... Steven G. Johnson
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia ... Steven G. Johnson
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Marcus Urban
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficiency vs C ... Simon Kornblith
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficiency ... Przemyslaw Szufel
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational efficie... Simon Kornblith
- [julia-users] Re: Julia computational eff... Przemyslaw Szufel
