Is there a way to get around this? I have a lot of types (foo1, foo2, ....) all of which are subtypes of an abstract (bar). I want to be able to define the behavior for arrays of any of the foos just by defining the behavior of an array of 'bar's. Any advice?
- [julia-users] Why isn't typeof(Float64[]) <: typeof(Re... Patrick Foley
- Re: [julia-users] Why isn't typeof(Float64[]) <: ... Kevin Squire
- [julia-users] Re: Why isn't typeof(Float64[]) <: ... Patrick Foley
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Why isn't typeof(Float64[]... Kevin Squire
- [julia-users] Re: Why isn't typeof(Float64[]) &l... Tobias Knopp
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Why isn't typeof(Float... Kevin Squire
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Why isn't typeof(F... John Myles White
- Re: [julia-users] Re: Why isn't typ... Kevin Squire
