Thanks Ivar for pointing that error of mine. I'd previously written the
deserialize in the main scope and got the same "function f not defined on
process 1", but then I rewrite it inside the `do` block without noticing it
introduces another scope.
So the real ERROR is the one you presented.
Meanwhile I worked around this issue by serializing not the function but
its Expression which is evaluated after the deserialization.
However, I still wonder if it is possible to do something like what I was
trying.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:25:37 AM UTC, Ivar Nesje wrote:
>
> This does not solve your problem, but you will get closer if you declare f
> as global so that you do not write to a local variable that will go out of
> scope as soon as it gets declared.
>
> open("f.jld", "r") do file
> global f = deserialize(file)
> end
> f(1)
> ERROR: function f not defined on process 1
> in error at error.jl:21
> in anonymous at serialize.jl:353
>
> I am not sure how deserialization of functions is intended to work, so
> this is all I could do.
>
>
> kl. 07:32:29 UTC+1 tirsdag 28. januar 2014 skrev Cristóvão Duarte Sousa
> følgende:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to do something like
>>
>> f(x) = x+1
>> open("f.jld", "w") do file
>> serialize(file, f)
>> end
>>
>> then, close julia, open it again and do
>>
>> open("f.jld", "r") do file
>> f = deserialize(file)
>> end
>> f(1)
>>
>> but that gives "ERROR: f not defined"
>>
>>
>> Is serialization supposed to be able to do this?
>> If yes, which is the right way to code it?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
