On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Pierre-Yves Gérardy <[email protected]>wrote:
> Yes, I tried it. My specific question is about the Base.parser() behavior > regarding integer literals: > > v0.3-pre/x64 produces an Int64 when it fits, and a :(@int128_str "...") > Expr when confronted with numbers that would overflow an Int64, but fit > an Int128. > > v0.2/x64 chokes on numbers that overflow Int64. > Yes, support for large integer literals was added during 0.3 development. Since it's a feature, not a bug fix, it won't be backported to the 0.2 line. > What about v0.2/x86 for numbers that overflow an Int32, but fit an Int64? > That has worked for a long time, well pre 0.2, so you should be fine.
