Thanks for the link, I will give it a try tonight.

One more reason I don't use IJulia: it failed to install (Win7 x64). I 
tried it again a few minutes ago, and I got errors again:

Processing archive: ...\downloads\libzmq-3.3-x64.zip
Error: Can not open file as archive
==[ ERROR: ZMQ ]===...

and in the end: ===[ BUILD ERRORS ] === (ZMQ had build errors)

I am sure others went through the same issues... Do you have a link for a 
fix, too?

On Saturday, March 8, 2014 7:32:25 PM UTC-7, Isaiah wrote:
>
> For redirect_stderr you can use a task to read the error output, see:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/julia-dev/1E6ag2Tfs9Q/LLsXMFvd0ugJ
>  
> > It will not solve my problem. I have to write technical documents in MS 
> Word (with hundreds of embedded calculations)
>
> I understand there may be many external constraints, as well as the 
> established workflow, but two points of information for future 
> consideration:
> 1. IJulia supports both inline code and LaTeX
> 2. one could potentially transform the notebook to MS Word format using 
> pandoc, as is done for PDF by IPython/IJulia (admittedly untested for MS 
> Word from IJulia, to my knowledge)
> http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Laszlo Hars <[email protected]<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> > 
>> `parse()` first, then syntax errors are returned
>> Nothing is returned, if there was a parse error. However, I can catch the 
>> error with try/catch. This is what I meant with "graceful error 
>> handling". Also, it only works with string arguments, not with expressions. 
>> As I said, passing nested strings inside the string argument is hard, and 
>> handling multi-line strings is ugly.
>>
>> > try out IJulia
>> It will not solve my problem. I have to write technical documents in MS 
>> Word (with hundreds of embedded calculations), and constantly switching 
>> applications and cutting-and-pasting text just drives me crazy. As I said, 
>> the Word-Julia interface I made (with an AutoHotkey script) works, but it 
>> is ugly.
>>
>> I would really appreciate if someone could answer my questions.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to