The Coverity results are useful but unrelated to the Julia syntax checker project. Anything related to Coverity would need to be done at the level of Julia's C and C++ internal implementation.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Siddhant Jain <[email protected]>wrote: > Alright. > > Thank you for your response. > I shall follow the suggestions that have been posted here. Have requested > for additional access for the coverity scan results. > > > > On Wednesday, 12 March 2014 04:03:22 UTC+5:30, Knud Sørensen wrote: >> >> Regarding warm-up task. >> >> You could take a look at the bugs found by coverity some time ago. >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/julia-dev/Lw4GF34VGbE/discussion >> >> >> On Tuesday, 11 March 2014 14:33:23 UTC+1, Siddhant Jain wrote: >>> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> This in regard to the 'Syntax Checker' project that has been mentioned >>> on the ideas page. >>> >>> I really like the idea and would like to work more on it. I am currently >>> working on a semester long project to develop a compiler independently and >>> hence have an idea as to what goes into making a lexer and parser.I believe >>> that is what we need here? Am I interpreting the project correctly? >>> >>> Can I be given a few warm-up tasks before I write my application? I >>> tried to look for any related up-for-grab tasks on github but couldn't find >>> any. >>> >>> >>> Any other details that can be shared about this project? >>> >>> I apologise for not reaching out earlier. University Mid terms were >>> badly timed. >>> >>> >>> I hope I can still make a contribution. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> - >>> >>> Siddhant Jain >>> Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani [India] >>> >>
