Many thanks!

Now I'm getting the same weird error using Images that I was getting using
GLUT:

julia> using Images
ERROR: error compiling init: error compiling init: could not load
module : dlopen(.dylib, 1): image not found
 in reload_path at loading.jl:144
 in _require at loading.jl:59
 in require at loading.jl:43
while loading /Users/ndv21/.julia/v0.3/Images/src/Images.jl, in
expression starting on line 205

Why is it trying to open ".dylib"?

Unfortunately I didn't try running this before doing Pkg.update(), so I
don't know if it's the update that caused this, or whether it's the result
of the problem I'm having with the GLUT package.

Best regards,
Nathaniel


On 16 March 2014 22:09, Tim Holy <[email protected]> wrote:

> I just tagged a new version that should be smarter about how it fails when
> ImageMagick isn't installed. Pkg.update() will get it for you.
>
> --Tim
>
> On Sunday, March 16, 2014 09:08:45 PM Nathaniel Virgo wrote:
> > On 16 March 2014 20:07, Tim Holy <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Nathaniel,
> >
> > > On Saturday, March 15, 2014 11:42:42 PM Nathaniel Virgo wrote:
> > > > Although the Homebrew issue is apparently fixed, I still get the
> > > > following error.
> > >
> > > I just don't know enough about Homebrew to be able to advise you here.
> >
> > No problem! As a newcomer, it wasn't obvious to me whether the error was
> > coming from Homebrew rather than anything else.
> >
> > Run those diagnostic commands _after_ you get this error---the whole
> point
> >
> > > is
> > > to see the variable settings that contributed to this problem.
> >
> > I see. Sorry, I assumed I wouldn't be able to run the other commands if
> the
> > first failed. Here is the output:
> >
> > julia> Images.LibMagick.have_imagemagick
> > false
> >
> > julia> Images.LibMagick.libwand
> > ""
> >
> > I have to say that your experience here makes me think Images needs to be
> >
> > > split into several parts, so that binary dependencies do not get in the
> > > way of
> > > people who just want to use it for its algorithms. Sadly, I'm just not
> > > sure
> > > I'll have time to get to that in the next week or two.
> >
> > That sounds like it would make sense once you have the time. (I'm not in
> a
> > hurry personally.)
> >
> > Nathaniel
>



-- 
Nathaniel Virgo
http://nathanielvirgo.com

Reply via email to