less memory intensive indeed. ah! understand. you mean the relation between 
speed and memory consumption
is your measure for better code (efficiency)

ok. fair enough. i was not concerning about memory usage, but i do agree 
with you perfectly.

thank you.

on the other hand. at the moment i am not concerned about memory usage but 
speed.

My aim is to be faster than Mathematica (no c-code etc. I could do this 
easily in Mathematica on my own...)

stefan

 

Reply via email to