See @simd: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/5355
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Mike Innes <[email protected]> wrote: > To be fair, the simplest implementation being the fastest isn't > *necessarily* to Julia's credit, since it may also mean that Julia can > only optimise the simplest code. Not saying that's the case here, but it's > worth looking at it from that angle. > > Chris' point gives me an idea for an @unroll macro - it could unroll a > generic for loop to do n at a time, or even take the loop out entirely > when the iterator is a compile-time constant. >
