Actually much more expensive, but I think that it could easily get
confusing to use the permuted Cholesky factor. We should probably have a
look at sqrtm and see if it could be made more efficient.  It allocates a
lot of memory and I am not sure that it is necessary.


2014-04-11 11:28 GMT+02:00 Toivo Henningsson <[email protected]>:

> Isn't sqrtm more computationally expensive?
>
>
> On Friday, 11 April 2014 09:03:38 UTC+2, Andreas Noack Jensen wrote:
>>
>> I think that sqrtm would often be the more reasonable advise. My guess is
>> that the Cholesky factor is very often used like a matrix square root.
>>
>


-- 
Med venlig hilsen

Andreas Noack Jensen

Reply via email to