just as a vague warning, va_arg lists are similar to, but subtly different from their fully specified counterparts. what this means is that calling printf from julia will work most of the time, but will also probably fail (by which I mean produce slightly incorrect output) at random and at the worst possible time given the same inputs
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Kevin Squire <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks interesting. I'm not at a computer right now, so can't test. Can you > give an example run? How are the timings? > > Kevin > > > On Sunday, April 20, 2014, Dominique Orban <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Here's how I wrapped printf, allowing for varargs: >> https://gist.github.com/dpo/11000433 >> I'd be interested in any comments. I expect it's possible to wrap scanf >> similarly?! >> >> On Friday, February 21, 2014 5:05:32 PM UTC-8, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >>> >>> You could maybe make vscanf and company work though. In general, using >>> the c library for this kind of thing will be awkward. >>> >>> > On Feb 21, 2014, at 7:12 PM, "Steven G. Johnson" <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > Varargs functions like scanf won't work with ccall, in general.
