good question, the Matlab version is now also released in the public domain. The code is in any case also given in Wikipedia.
-- Niko On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 17:07:13 UTC+2, John Myles White wrote: > > If someone feels up to it, it would be great to ask the author why the > Python version is public domain and the Matlab version is GPL. > > -- John > > On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Isaiah Norton <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Maybe this is less useful, but the basic/demo version (by the author > himself) is public domain: > https://www.lri.fr/~hansen/barecmaes2.py > > And the Apache commons Java version claims to be Apache licensed, though > it is explicitly derived from the GPL matlab code. > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Billou Bielour > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Actually I missed it, but it's under GNU General Public License. >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 4, 2013 8:43:19 AM UTC-5, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >>> >>> No explicit license is the same as all rights reserved, so that's not >>> ok, regardless of the existence of other implementations. If this >>> implementation is not based on other ones, then it is ok, or if it's based >>> on another implementation that has an MIT or BSD license, then that might >>> also be ok (although if that license was not legally applied in the first >>> place, then it's not ok for us either). License stuff is annoying and >>> nasty, but we have to be careful. >>> >> > >
