Thanks for pointing that out Ivar. I'm not sure how I managed to get to the 0.1 docs. I didn't have the tab open *that* long.
Currently, http://docs.julialang.org points to http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.2/ which seems sensible, as it's the current release. I see the link is indeed fixed in the latest docs. I guess since the release of 0.3 is fairly imminent, a fix to the website will be coming. Andy On Thursday, 1 May 2014 10:15:40 UTC+1, Ivar Nesje wrote: > > julia-users is a perfect place to start, if you don't know where to report > any kind of Julia issue. For simple errors in the documentation, the > appropriate fix is to submit a Pull Request on github that changes the > appropriate files in the doc/ directory. > > This particular issue has been fixed in the latest > documentation<http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/manual/getting-started/#resources>. > > I don't know how to update the older docs, but it might work to submit a > pull request against the 0.1-release branch. 0.1 has been obsolete half a > year, so I don't think this is a high priority. Unfortunately links and > search often points to the old versions, so we should probably consider > adding a banner on top of every page to make people aware that they are > using the docs for a very old Julia version. > > Ivar > > kl. 09:51:36 UTC+2 torsdag 1. mai 2014 skrev Andrew Gibb følgende: >> >> Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this. >> >> The link on this page: >> http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.1/manual/getting-started/ >> >> With the text >> Tutorial for Homer Reid’s numerical analysis class >> is broken. At a guess, it should point here: >> >> http://homerreid.dyndns.org/teaching/18.330/JuliaProgramming.shtml >> >> Andy >> >
