On Thursday, May 1, 2014 4:17:27 PM UTC-4, Tim Holy wrote: > On Thursday, May 01, 2014 01:34:41 PM Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > It occurs to me that now that we separate .+ from + it may make sense > for x > > .+= y to be allowed to mutate x. After all, you are saying that you > expect > > an array in some sense. > > If that's safe, I'd love it. >
Me too. And I think it'd make sense to land at the same time as Array Views.
