A perennial struggle. In this case I personally didn't take it in a bad way – I 
can certainly see how it seems stupid unless you know about the type stability 
issue. This is one of those unsatisfying corners of reality that don't seem to 
have a satisfying solution.

> On Jun 6, 2014, at 9:56 PM, John Myles White <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> No worries. After more than two years on it, I’m still figuring out what’s 
> the right tone for the mailing list.
> 
>  — John
> 
>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:42 PM, Zahirul ALAM <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks John. 
>> 
>> with regards to your side note, I will refrain from using that word. In my 
>> defense, my drink-fuddled brain was very frustrated. ;)
>> 
>>> On Friday, 6 June 2014 20:10:14 UTC-4, John Myles White wrote:
>>> You should use 10^-2.0. The way you’re trying to do things would require 
>>> that the power function produce different types of outputs for different 
>>> input values, which would make optimization/compilation difficult. 
>>> 
>>> As a side note, I think you’ll find it’s more effective not to use the word 
>>> “stupid”. 
>>> 
>>>  — John 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Zahirul ALAM <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>> 
>>> > 10^2 returns 100; 
>>> > but 10^-2  or 10^(-2) returns  ERROR: DomainError in power_by_squaring at 
>>> > intfuncs.jl:60  in ^ at intfuncs.jl:84 
>>> > 
>>> > do I have to use 1/10^2 instead? 
>>> > 
>>> > This seems rather stupid. is it a Bug? I am using the nightly build 
>>> > version downloaded a couple of days ago. I am new to Julia and trying to 
>>> > convert my a large Mathematica code in Julia.
> 

Reply via email to