More recent version may be more complete: http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/manual/performance-tips/
We've not yet spent a lot of time optimizing strings and I/O but we still tend to be around the same as Python, which tends to be much faster than Ruby but slower than Perl. So if your code is much slower in Julia than in Ruby, something is almost certainly amiss. > On Jun 10, 2014, at 8:28 PM, John Myles White <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Have you read the performance section of the manual? That may help you find > issues in your code: > http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.2/manual/performance-tips/ > > -- John > >> On Jun 10, 2014, at 5:26 PM, Rich Morin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Jun 10, 2014, at 17:16, Keno Fischer wrote: >>> There are no limitations inherent to the language. That said, >>> string processing is currently a little slow, though there are >>> concrete plans to fix that. We can't really say whether those >>> problems are at work here without looking at the code. It might >>> very well be something else that is simple to fix. >> >> Thanks! If I can't figure out the problem(s), I'll post the code >> and a data set, then see if anyone has suggestions to offer. I'm >> running on an 8-core Mac Pro, so if user-mode CPU time is an issue, >> I may be able to get some speedups from parallelization... >> >> -r >> >> -- >> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin [email protected] >> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume San Bruno, CA, USA +1 650-873-7841 >> >> Software system design, development, and documentation >
