I'm struggling with something like this:

Module M
  foo = 1
  bar()=foo # it's not obvious if foo can be modified. Ok, maybe I should
not need a FYI even.
  f1()=(global foo=2 ) # this is clear.
  f2()=(foo = 3 ) # how could I get a warning out of this? it's perfectly
legal and may or may not do what the author intends.
end



On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Maybe I'm confused about what you mean by "using globals". I assumed you
> mean just accessing a global in any way from a function. So, for example,
> this would be using a global:
>
> module M
>   foo = 1
>   bar() = foo
> end
>
>
> But this has no side effects since the global isn't modified. Are you
> talking about assigning to a global from inside a function? If so, doesn't
> that *require* the global declaration? Or are you talking about mutating
> the content of a global – which doesn't change it's binding. E.g. something
> like this:
>
> module N
>   a = [1]
>   b(x::Int) = push!(a,x)
> end
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Tony Fong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I thought I was catching the right error, but later realized that I
>> was being too militant assuming that a proper function has no "closure".
>> Obviously there is, and the default closure has all the globals.
>>
>> However, I think using globals in a function can be surprising for a user
>> that assumes no side effect, so I could "downgrade" the lint message level
>> from ERROR to FYI. What do you think?
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 10:22:42 AM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>>
>>> This is really nice work. In the future, I'd really like to move bits of
>>> TypeCheck and this sort of linting into base Julia, maybe invoked with a -w
>>> flag.
>>>
>>> Regarding this:
>>>
>>> Using globals in function without declaring them (This one isn't an
>>>> error, but I personally prefer explicit declaration of globals dependency
>>>> inside functions for readability.)
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how you're dealing with this, but this would, as stated,
>>> warn every time you call a function the way I'm reading it. Are you
>>> specifically not warning for globals that are used as call heads? I
>>> certainly wouldn't want to have to declare as global every function I'm
>>> going to use.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Tony Fong <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's a great idea! I'll look into it. Thanks for the pointer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:50:27 AM UTC-4, René Donner wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how feasible it is, but a (perhaps optional) inclusion of
>>>>> the functionality in https://github.com/astrieanna/TypeCheck.jl would
>>>>> be great!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to