Thank you for your kind replies. I noticed that I'm not familiar with array comprehension style in Julia. I added your solutions to my repos. (If you have any problem to do it, please tell me)
As Alireza said, this is just a translation from numpy, but I believe there are good questions suitable for Julia. Why don't you propose more Julia like exercises using pull request! (Especially, I think harven's Generators exercise is good for example.) I have a question. Alireza told me solution for Expert.4 as following. > Another thing is that more functional-type coding is also emphasized in julia. Here's a solution for Expert.4 (which I notice you've left empty): > reduce(+, [A*x for A in matlist, x in veclist]) It seems to return scalar value 800000, but original numpy version's result is as following 20x1 vector. How can I reduce keeping array? ``` [[ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.] [ 200.]] ``` 2014年6月22日日曜日 23時43分32秒 UTC+9 Michiaki Ariga: > > Hi all, > > I'm a Julia newbee, and I'm trying to learn Julia and wrote Julia version > of rougier's 100 numpy exercises( > http://www.loria.fr/~rougier/teaching/numpy.100/index.html). > > https://github.com/chezou/julia-100-exercises > > I'd like you to tell me more "julia way" or something wrong with. > > Best regards, > Michiaki >
