> My only concern is using an undocumented function. It may change or get removed.
To be fair, you're using a pre-release *language*. Even though there are probably some things that are *very* unlikely to change, there's no promise of backward-compatibility yet, as far as I've understood things. And if that specific piece of functionality would change or be removed, it'll probably be replaced by something that does the same thing, but better. // T On Sunday, June 29, 2014 6:34:33 PM UTC+2, Laszlo Hars wrote: > > Thanks, Steve. I did not know about "Base.parse_input_line". It can very > well be the solution together with capturing STDOUT with redefining > display(). My only concern is using an undocumented function. It may change > or get removed. > > On Sunday, June 29, 2014 10:15:29 AM UTC-6, Steven G. Johnson wrote: >> >> On Sunday, June 29, 2014 12:04:00 PM UTC-4, Laszlo Hars wrote: >>> >>> >>> Now "only" the problem of catching syntax error messages remain >>> >> >> My example code already catches syntax errors. I don't see the >> difficulty here. >> >
