Surely we need to get rid of the current packages 
page: http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/packages/packagelist/

It's still pretty high up google and people are surely going to it and 
coming away disappointed that a package doesn't exist when actually it does.

It wasn't until I found this thread that I discovered that that list was 
actually depreciated.

At the very least it should have a "DEPRECIATED, NEW LIST HERE" warning at 
the top?

On Friday, 2 May 2014 04:32:06 UTC+1, Jacques Rioux wrote:
>
> Or may I suggest simply calling Pkg.available() in the Julia REPL 
> directly. 
>
> You get the list right there for you.to browse and inspect.
>
> And it is always up to date.
> On May 1, 2014 3:20 PM, "Iain Dunning" <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> I see. Well, I guess in that case the list at 
>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/METADATA.jl is probably the way to go.
>>
>> I think you are pointing out a more general "discoverability" problem 
>> though, which we still haven't tackled (some sort of tagging system has 
>> been thrown around before).
>>
>> On Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:57:42 PM UTC-4, Hans W Borchers wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for taking so much of your time.
>>>
>>> I mean a simple and easily scrollable list of packages such as is 
>>> available in the left frame of page http://docs.julialang.org/en/
>>> release-0.2/packages/packagelist/ . Many package names give a good hint 
>>> to what they are doing, thus finding things I would not have expected (and 
>>> therefore could not search for). 
>>>
>>> Without that list I could not have generated the list of Julia packages 
>>> for numerical math that I posted in the thread "All packages for numerical 
>>> math" on April 25. I could not have done this with, e.g., 
>>> http://iainnz.github.io/packages.julialang.org/ .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 1, 2014 8:36:13 PM UTC+2, Iain Dunning wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There are over 300 packages so it I'm not really sure how a table of 
>>>> contents would help - could you describe what you'd want one for? The 
>>>> easiest way to find a package is to start typing its name.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, May 1, 2014 2:09:42 PM UTC-4, Hans W Borchers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This list is difficult to scroll (because of using large fonts, 
>>>>> probably).
>>>>> I am still missing a "table of contents" like on the package list for 
>>>>> version 0.2.0 !
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to