+1 for "Theme Parks"

On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 5:12:10 PM UTC-7, Hans W Borchers wrote:
>
> What about building something similar as the "task views" in R? (I don't 
> know what a better term there could be for it, perhaps "theme parks"?)
>
> Task views as Github projects could be expanded by the community easily. 
> The list of task views could be pointed to in the main menu of Julia's home 
> page. Each task view would have a maintainer, not an organization, because 
> there would be many more views than organizations. The maintainer can 
> decide whether he wants to include work in progress, etc.
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 11:15:20 PM UTC+2, Iain Dunning wrote:
>>
>> Great suggestions/discussion everyone. I think without a stronger vote of 
>> confidence in the idea there isn't much reason to proceed.
>>
>> Re: svaksha's list, it is good, and I'd be curious how much traffic it 
>> gets. Its kinda chaotic though and has some errors, mainly because its 
>> pretty hard to be an expert in everything (and thus able to describe and 
>> categorize them). Plus there is the whole problem of the many pieces of 
>> code that get mentioned on the list but are unmaintained - testing related 
>> packages being my personal favourite.
>>
>> I've got some ideas for changes to pkg.julialang.org that would raise 
>> the prominence of organizations, who I think should be the ones leading 
>> discoverability of the packages in their realm as they know their area 
>> best. I'm also thinking of more ways to indicate package 
>> "quality"/development level for integration in the UI (see the Github stars 
>> I added recently). I'm going to collect a bunch of metrics and mash them 
>> together - we can then discuss the weightings.
>>
>> Hans: understandable you wouldn't have heard about CVX.jl yet, its not 
>> ready for public consumption. Should be ready by end of summer, at least a 
>> first pass. As for BlackBoxOptim, I'm not sure if you are implying some 
>> effort by myself or others to exclude it from JuliaOpt or METADATA, but 
>> that isn't the case - the author just hasn't done the work to list it. I've 
>> just reached out to him again, but if you are interested in it, then you 
>> should help out - this is open source after all, and we are all busy with 
>> other things.
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 2:31:32 AM UTC-4, Hans W Borchers wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hint to this very helpful list of (mostly) not-metadated 
>>> packages. I started a list of Numerical Math packages for Julia myself, 
>>> because I did not find categorized or compiled information like here. Only 
>>> I am missing more information on optimization and simulation packages out 
>>> there.
>>>
>>> I think it is not so much a question of whether a package has enough 
>>> quality to be listed as a registered package. There will be package 
>>> developments going on for one or two years before they will appear on the 
>>> 'official' list, but I would still like to know about them.
>>>
>>> For example, I learned only from John Miles White's report on JuliaCon 
>>> about the CVX.jl package, though I had made a request about "convex 
>>> programming" on the julia-opt list some weeks ago.
>>>
>>> There is a useful BlackBoxOptim.jl package for global optimization that 
>>> has made it neither on the METADATA list nor on JuliaOpt page. I don't know 
>>> the reason, but the author seemed highly interested to see it there.
>>>
>>> Maybe, on the list of registered packages there should only appear 
>>> "recommended packages" (in the sense R adds them to the base installation). 
>>> And yes, information about other available packages needs to be improved -- 
>>> but perhaps this is more the task of the community, not of the core 
>>> developers, in the form of blogs or more pages like Svaksha's.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 4:51:03 AM UTC+2, Isaiah wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On the discoverability side, svaksha's curated collection really 
>>>> deserves more attention - it is categorized and provides short summaries 
>>>> of 
>>>> code ranging from listed packages to useful fragments that never showed up 
>>>> on the mailing lists.
>>>>
>>>> http://svaksha.github.io/Julia.jl/
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>
>>

Reply via email to