Of course, Here is the link: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/7512
kl. 16:32:00 UTC+2 torsdag 3. juli 2014 skrev Samuel Colvin følgende:
>
> Larger scope makes a lot of sense.
>
> Please give a link to the issue here once it's created.
>
> On Thursday, 3 July 2014 15:17:22 UTC+1, Tobias Knopp wrote:
>>
>> Great, thanks!
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2014 16:10:08 UTC+2 schrieb Ivar Nesje:
>>>
>>> I don't think so. I'll open one.
>>>
>>> kl. 16:06:42 UTC+2 torsdag 3. juli 2014 skrev Tobias Knopp følgende:
>>>>
>>>> Ivar, I absolutely agree with you. This should be handled in a larger
>>>> scope. Do we have an issue for this yet?
>>>>
>>>> Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2014 15:42:09 UTC+2 schrieb Ivar Nesje:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would strongly argue against
>>>>>
>>>>> +(a::String, b::String) == Error("Use * for string concatenation")
>>>>>
>>>>> We have plenty of cases where we want to give a more helpful
>>>>> `MethodError`. We should really create a simple system where you can get
>>>>> those hints printed in the REPL, without defining more methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> The display of MethodError is defined in
>>>>> https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/0df386db18dd186c7b0bffc74149fc6b0e51c67d/base/replutil.jl#L110
>>>>>
>>>>> and it would be easy to have a lookup table at the end of that function
>>>>> to
>>>>> see if one of the "banned" methods (with usefull, more concistent
>>>>> alternaltives) were called.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ivar
>>>>>
>>>>> kl. 15:11:43 UTC+2 torsdag 3. juli 2014 skrev Samuel Colvin følgende:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fundamentally I don't think it matters which mathematical operator we
>>>>>> use for an operation that's not strictly mathematical (or at least most
>>>>>> users don't think of as mathematical), everyone is quite happy with "x =
>>>>>> 4"
>>>>>> not having it's rigorous meaning of "x == 4". As long as there's a
>>>>>> compact
>>>>>> and clear way of doing string concatenation I'm happy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If most people want * that's fine especially as there would need to
>>>>>> be a very good reason to change it now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The point is that we should make it as easy as possible for people to
>>>>>> transition to Julia from other languages, and this is one potential
>>>>>> stumbling block.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with Tobias's suggestion of a REPL, IJulia only +(s1::String,
>>>>>> s2::String) that throws an informative error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For my part I've updated Julia By Example
>>>>>> <http://www.scolvin.com/juliabyexample/#Strings-Basics> to give an
>>>>>> example and a link to this discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
