Lint now checks for redefining mathematical constant.
On Saturday, July 5, 2014 4:29:41 AM UTC+7, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > No problem. Glad we weren't using the wrong value of e! :-) > > On Jul 4, 2014, at 5:08 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > Oops. > > That's exactly what happened. > > I was running through > > http://www.scolvin.com/juliabyexample/#Strings-Basics > > yesterday and forgot I ran these lines. > > Sorry about that, > > Jim > > On Friday, July 4, 2014 4:58:43 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >> >> I suspect that Ivar may be right about that accidental assignment. If you >> did the assignment before using e then you won't get a warning even. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It doesn't behave that way for me >>> >>> julia> e >>> e = 2.7182818284590... >>> >>> julia> e == 2.718 >>> false >>> >>> Did you by accident do something like this by accident? >>> julia> e = 2.718 >>> Warning: imported binding for e overwritten in module Main >>> 2.718 >>> >>> Ivar >>> >>> kl. 22:29:20 UTC+2 fredag 4. juli 2014 skrev [email protected] >>> følgende: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Is there a reason why the irrational constant e seems to be rounded to >>>> three decimal places? >>>> >>>> julia> e >>>> 2.718 >>>> >>>> julia> e == 2.718 >>>> true >>>> >>>> Version 0.3.0-prerelease+3921 (2014-06-28 02:01 UTC) >>>> Commit 0b46af5* (5 days old master) >>>> x86_64-linux-gnu >>>> >>>> Thanks for any info, >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
