It's hard to tell for sure, I wouldn't know how to check that. I prefer to
port a few more solutions. My curiosity was much increased by this one:
julia> include("julia/jl/e443gcd.jl")
elapsed time: 3.255950529 seconds (929628 bytes allocated)
The Java original "runs" much longer, 33 seconds.
Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2014 21:36:30 UTC+2 schrieb Stefan Karpinski:
>
> Maybe we need to undeprecate the order keyword until we can make function
> arguments faster. When I deprecated that, I figured we'd have that soon,
> but it hasn't happened yet. In this case, I wonder if the comparison
> function is getting inlined in C++ but not in Julia. The function call
> overhead could make a 2x difference like you're seeing.
>
>
>
