Heh, I knew it would have been discussed to death already. Thanks for the 
quick replies!

Also, forgot to mention in the previous message, but it's a great 
introduction indeed! Had to download and play at 1.3x speed though

On Friday, 11 July 2014 22:36:45 UTC+2, Patrick O'Leary wrote:
>
> Start with the discussion in https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/249 
> and branch out from there for the discussion.
>
> On Friday, July 11, 2014 3:17:49 PM UTC-5, Job van der Zwan wrote:
>>
>> So this is an offtopic question inspired by the talk: around the 57th 
>> minute in the second video there's a discussion about + and +=. Although I 
>> didn't hear the question, I assume it was equal to mine: if we had a 
>> separate += operator, then *a += b* could be defined to update the 
>> fields of a, whereas *a = a + b* requires the creation of a new object. 
>> Since "don't generate garbage in the first place" is a good form of memory 
>> optimisation in *any *garbage collected language, that sounds like quite 
>> a legit use-case to me, especially in a language dedicated to number 
>> crunching.
>>
>> Now, I assume the Julia team has also thought of this, so I'm wondering 
>> why it was decided to not have the possibility to overload *+=*, *-=*, 
>> etcetera? You could still go with *a += b* being the same as *a = a + b* 
>> if it isn't explicitly defined, to keep things convenient.
>>
>> On Thursday, 10 July 2014 19:41:21 UTC+2, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>>>
>>> This should absolutely be linked to from the home page – it's a really 
>>> great starting point for learning Julia.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Jake Bolewski <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Congrats David that tutorial went really well.  Perhaps now that we are 
>>>> going to be collecting a large number of videos about Julia these can be 
>>>> linked from the home page so they are bit easier to find?
>>>>
>>>> -Jake 
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:13:34 AM UTC-4, John Myles White wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is a really great tutorial. 
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- John 
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:54 AM, David P. Sanders <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>
>>>>> > Many thanks to all those who suffered my inane questions and helped 
>>>>> this to take shape, in particular: 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > - Jeff, who persuaded me to try out Julia 
>>>>> > - Alonso & Luis, who convinced me that it was worth pursuing 
>>>>> > - The JuliaCon organizers, speakers, and participants 
>>>>> > - Leah for a couple of discussions about Julia tutorials 
>>>>> > - The Julia team at MIT who put up with me last week and moulded it: 
>>>>> Jiahao, Jake, Keno & Alan 
>>>>> > - Last, but not least, everybody who has answered my threads on 
>>>>> julia-users! 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to