Thanks. I'll be checking those sources for more indepth info and how to implement it.
On Saturday, July 26, 2014 1:14:39 PM UTC-3, Elliot Saba wrote: > > You should be aware however, that there can be problems with accessing > Julia code and variables from multiple threads. In particular, if you pass > a Julia callback to C code, that Julia callback needs to run on the same > thread as the one that created the callback in the first place, I believe. > You can read about this at the Thread-Safety > <http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/manual/calling-c-and-fortran-code/#thread-safety> > section > of the page Tim was talking about. > -E > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Tim Holy <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Yes, check out the section of the manual on calling C and Fortran code. >> >> --Tim >> >> On Saturday, July 26, 2014 08:16:35 AM David A. wrote: >> > Sounds good. Would it be possible for the C++ function to have access to >> > Julia's arrays without copying them? (ie passing them by reference) >> > >> > On Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:21:06 AM UTC-3, Tim Holy wrote: >> > > On Friday, July 25, 2014 09:49:47 PM David A. wrote: >> > > > Is it possible to parallelize the execution of a C++ function using >> > > >> > > Julia? >> > > Yes, if you can call the C++ function in the first place. Currently >> your >> > > best >> > > bet is to write a C wrapper. There's the very primitive Cpp package, >> and >> > > Keno's got a real solution to the problem over at >> > > https://github.com/Keno/CXX.jl, but I don't know if it's really >> ready for >> > > users who are not Keno :). >> > > >> > > > And would it be similarly efficient as doing it directly in C++? >> > > >> > > Depends on how you do it. You can, of course, just call pthreads from >> > > julia >> > > (it's a C library, after all). Alternatively start a number of julia >> > > processes. >> > > >> > > You will want to read the parallel programming section of the manual. >> > > >> > > --Tim >> >> >
