Unfortunately lots of other things on the internet is growing 
exponentially, so it's not necessarily us that comes out on top.

Also from the github traffic data (hope it's OK to share this), we 
had 74,369 views on github last two weeks divided by 6,710 unique visitors. 
The most popular issue was @quinnj <https://github.com/quinnj>'s PR #7671 
<https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/7671> with 453 views among 93 
unique visitors (4.8 page loads per visitor). Clearly a lot of thought went 
into how append! should behave when convert fails.

Ivar 

kl. 22:37:10 UTC+2 fredag 1. august 2014 skrev Stefan Karpinski følgende:
>
> That appears to be exponential growth doubling every three months. Soon 
> all of StackOverflow will be questions about Julia. Similarly, traffic to 
> julialang.org has been doubling every nine months, so in a few years most 
> traffic on the Internet will be people visiting the Julia website.
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Stu Thompson <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Correct.
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>> Stu Thompson   /forio  |  +1 (415) 518 32 19  |  forio.com 
>> <http://www.forio.com/> 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Douglas Bates <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> What are the lines on the plot?  I am assuming that the magenta color is 
>>> the raw counts and the green is some kind of smoothed values (moving 
>>> averages?).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, August 1, 2014 3:03:36 PM UTC-5, Stu Thompson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to share a graph with everyone: JuliaLang questions posted on 
>>>> #StackOverflow by month from January 2012 to end of July 2014.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ​I've been putting this together for since the beginning of the year as 
>>>> one of my metrics for gauging the growth of the Julia user community.  It 
>>>> is really exciting to see such a huge tick upwards lately. 
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Stu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stu Thompson   /forio  |  +1 (415) 518 32 19  |  forio.com 
>>>> <http://www.forio.com/> 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>
>

Reply via email to