How come I did not notice. I hope we never make stupid enough mistakes in 1.0 that we will ever need a 2.X release (and even worse a 3.0 release).
kl. 20:27:35 UTC+2 lørdag 2. august 2014 skrev Jacob Quinn følgende: > > Do note that the imminent release is **0.3**, not *3.0*. There's been a > little confusion around about Julia's versioning, so just thought I'd > clarify. > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Daniel Carrera <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> >> On 1 August 2014 14:04, Ivar Nesje <[email protected] <javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/julialang/julia/blob/master/NEWS.md >>> >>> Currently we only have caching of object code for Base, but there is >>> some tricks you can use to include extra packages in addition to Base when >>> you compile. >>> >>> kl. 14:00:23 UTC+2 fredag 1. august 2014 skrev Daniel Carrera følgende: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> As the title suggests, I'd like to know what are the key features or >>>> improvements in the upcoming Julia 3.0 (whenever it is released). >>>> >>>> One feature that I hope to see is either faster compiles or caching. >>>> One of the big selling points of Julia is its speed, but the fact that it >>>> has to recompile itself constantly every time you run a program really >>>> gets >>>> in the way of performance. I imagine that the solution is to cache object >>>> code so that you only compile the stuff that has changed since the last >>>> run. I am also sure that this is easier said than done. Does Julia 3.0 >>>> include any work in this area? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> When an engineer says that something can't be done, it's a code phrase >> that means it's not fun to do. >> > >
