I suspect the optimal is necessary as it's a common rhetoric in certain statistical communities. Cf. optimal classification as described in political science.
-- John On Aug 13, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Stefan Karpinski <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool stuff. May I preemptively suggest calling it BayesianClassifiers? I'm > assuming the "optimal" part is redundant since no one will be clamoring for > suboptimal Bayesian classifiers. > > On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Jason Knight <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm currently working with Optimal Bayesian Classifiers with my >> not-really-ready-for-public-consumption package OBC.jl. It's currently quite >> specialized for bioinformatics (RNA-Seq) data, so probably not what you >> want, but I thought I'd throw it out there. :) >> >> You can also read more about OBC here if interested. >> >> Jason >> >> On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 7:20:51 AM UTC-5, Anuj Prakash wrote: >> Hey >> >> I wanted to know about some good Julia packages for binary classification. >> Feel free to include those dealing with trees also. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Anuj
