Absolutely. Already had ~10 packages break today due to 0.4 stuff, I expect 
plenty more. 

On Friday, August 15, 2014 11:24:18 AM UTC-4, John Myles White wrote:
>
> I agree: I think most people should not use 0.4 beause it’s going to 
> change so frequently.
>
>  — John
>
> On Aug 15, 2014, at 12:28 AM, Tobias Knopp <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> I think we should discourage using 0.4-dev version until feature freeze. 
> There might be a lot of package breakage (wasn't there once a term "chaos 
> month"?).
>
>
> Am Freitag, 15. August 2014 09:16:20 UTC+2 schrieb Andreas Lobinger:
>>
>> Hello colleague,
>>
>> i was aware that there are parallel installations With the 'smallest 
>> problem' i meant i immediately recognized a bunch of other problems, alike
>>
>>  WARNING: split(x,y,k::Bool) is deprecated, use split($(Expr(:parameters, 
>> :(keep=k))),x,y) instead.
>>  in _atox at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/config.jl:30
>>  in config_options at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/config.jl:62
>>  in iniattr at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/Winston.jl:2539
>>  in HalfAxisX at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/Winston.jl:572
>>  in FramedPlot at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/Winston.jl:1000
>>  in figure at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/Winston.jl:2678
>>  in display at /home/lobi/.julia/v0.4/Winston/src/Winston.jl:2707
>>  in display at multimedia.jl:149
>>  in print_response at REPL.jl:140
>>  in print_response at REPL.jl:125
>>  in anonymous at REPL.jl:584
>>  in run_interface at ./LineEdit.jl:1377
>>  in run_interface_3B_1862 at /home/lobi/julia/usr/bin/../lib/julia/sys.so
>>  in run_frontend at ./REPL.jl:816
>>  in run_repl at ./REPL.jl:170
>>  in _start at ./client.jl:399
>>  in _start_3B_1725 at /home/lobi/julia/usr/bin/../lib/julia/sys.so
>>
>> so i rolled back to RC4 and try to update my work to that.
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to