Yeah, that seems pretty broken. Would be mind filing an issue?
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Tomas Lycken <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't say why, but it seems x.2 is parsed as .2x, which intentionally > evaluates as .2*x... > > // T >
- [julia-users] Literal numeric coefficient on RHS of varia... Peter Simon
- [julia-users] Literal numeric coefficient on RHS of ... Tomas Lycken
- Re: [julia-users] Literal numeric coefficient on... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Literal numeric coefficien... Peter Simon
- Re: [julia-users] Literal numeric coeffi... Stefan Karpinski
- Re: [julia-users] Literal numeric c... Peter Simon
- Re: [julia-users] Literal numer... Stefan Karpinski
