Whoops, sorry about that Florian! There must be a small error in the .dmg filename, but if you open it, you see there is a Julia-0.3.0-rc4.app inside. -E
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote: > #7846 <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/7846> > > and > > Base.runtests > <http://docs.julialang.org/en/latest/stdlib/test/?highlight=runtests#Base.runtests> > > kl. 14:52:00 UTC+2 tirsdag 19. august 2014 skrev Johan Sigfrids følgende: > >> Is there a way for a user that downloads the RC4 binary to run the test >> suit? That would be a good way to help uncover those pesky bugs. >> >> On Monday, August 18, 2014 6:36:47 PM UTC+3, Stefan Karpinski wrote: >>> >>> +1,000,000 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:25 AM, John Myles White <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> One of the best things you can do for the Julia community is to start >>>> using the release candidates of 0.3. Everyone will be better off if bugs >>>> are found now rather than when 0.3 is released. You can help make 0.3 a >>>> better release by installing one of the latest binaries and testing it out. >>>> >>>> This is especially important for projects like DataFrames, which have >>>> fewer developer hours to spare on issues related to 0.2. >>>> >>>> — John >>>> >>>> >>>
