That's certainly a possibility – perhaps part of the planned paranoid mode that lints code etc.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Adam Strzelecki <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's exactly why we can't do it. Julia is for people who are sketching > with code as much as it is for people who are building robust systems. The > default has to be easy and obvious – and the most obvious, no fuss default > is to let you change things. If there are going to be limits put on > programmers for robustness, they need to be opt-in. Ideally it should be > simple and convenient to opt into, but still, optional. > > Fair enough. Maybe then enforce these only for (public) modules? > > --Adam
