Mohammed, the last post was over 6 months ago - what precisely is not valid?
On Sunday, August 24, 2014 8:06:50 PM UTC-4, Mohammed El-Beltagy wrote: > > That is no longer valid under in Julia 0.3. The code only runs 3x faster > and the type stable code looks a bit more complex. > > On Monday, December 16, 2013 8:48:40 PM UTC+2, John Myles White wrote: >> >> I think Michael is suggesting that it would help to have an automated >> tool to do this. This stuff comes up in subtle ways in complex code. While >> editing some of the t-SNE code someone posted recently, I found that just >> removing a single type-unstable call to maximum made the code 100x faster. >> It was a bit too complex to read through code_typed or anything else, so >> automated tools would make a big difference. >> >> -- John >> >> On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:46 AM, Ivar Nesje <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You might use code_typed and look at the output and see if it looks >> curious. >> >> kl. 19:28:05 UTC+1 mandag 16. desember 2013 skrev John Myles White >> følgende: >>> >>> I believe Leah was working on a tool to do some of this. >>> >>> -- John >>> >>> On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Michael Fox <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > After reading about type stability in the FAQ and this excellent post >>> -- >>> http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2013/12/06/writing-type-stable-code-in-julia/ >>> >>> -- I want to make sure I'm doing it right. >>> > >>> > Is there any way to ask Julia if a particular function has achieved >>> type stability? This would be a good feature for julialint. >>> >>> >>
