My bad. Didn't read this carefully enough to realize this comment applied to my issue.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:47 AM, John Myles White <[email protected] > wrote: > The NEWS.md file does cover this: > > • Ranges and arrays with the same elements are now unequal. This allows > hashing and comparing ranges to be faster. (#5778) > > On Aug 25, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Ed Scheinerman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks again for the pointer to the release notes. > > > > The issue I raised was not dealt with in the release notes: namely, 1:5 > == [1:5] evaluates as true in Julia 0.2 but as false in Julia 0.3. > > > > I think the new behavior is a problem. I was happy with the old > behavior, but if this is a bad idea for some reason, I would prefer that > Julia raised an error in this situation rather than give a result that (in > my opinion) is wrong. Certainly Julia compares objects of different type > for equality (e.g. 0==0.0) so the fact that 1:5 and [1:5] are different > types is not the issue. > > > > > > On Saturday, August 23, 2014 9:06:50 AM UTC-4, Valentin Churavy wrote: > > There is https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/v0.3.0/NEWS.md > > > > On Saturday, 23 August 2014 15:02:56 UTC+2, Ed Scheinerman wrote: > > Is there a document describing new features and significant changes > between versions 0.2 and 0.3? > > > > One item I noticed is that in 0.2 the express 1:5 == [1:5] evaluated as > true, but in 0.3 it's false. > > -- Ed Scheinerman ([email protected])
