In partiuclar, Coveralls won't get confused if we push both? --Tim
On Monday, August 25, 2014 10:10:10 PM Elliot Saba wrote: > Only if there are features you need that exist in one and not the other, I > suppose. > -E > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Tim Holy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Once nightly and release become different again, will we need to reinstate > > the > > if clauses? > > > > --Tim > > > > On Monday, August 25, 2014 06:45:41 PM Iain Dunning wrote: > > > Check what I just did for HttpCommon, only thing lacking is a Pkg.build > > > > > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/HttpCommon.jl/blob/master/.travis.yml > > > > > > script: > > > - julia -e 'Pkg.init(); Pkg.clone(pwd())' > > > - julia -e 'Pkg.test("HttpCommon", coverage=true)' > > > after_success: > > > - julia -e 'cd(Pkg.dir("HttpCommon")); Pkg.add("Coverage"); using > > > > Coverage; > > > > > Coveralls.submit(Coveralls.process_folder())' > > > > > > This what I hope to see most packages look like now > > > > > > On Monday, August 25, 2014 7:52:21 PM UTC-4, Elliot Saba wrote: > > > > I think that should be considered a bug, since clone() calls resolve() > > > > which calls build()..... but only for the stuff that resolve() thinks > > > > has > > > > > > changed. We should probably just call build() after resolve() in > > > > clone. > > > > > > -E
