Mostly things at the top scope and in a function work the same, but type inference is different in global scope which can affect things. It would be helpful to see the code you're running (or a reduced version of it).
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, RecentConvert <[email protected]> wrote: > How does Julia treat an inputless function as compared to a script with > the same contents? > > Normally I create a function by first coding it as a script as it's easier > to access the variables for testing. Once that is done I do the simple > conversions to a function. Unfortunately in this case it changed the > outcome of the code. If I comment out the function line and it's > corresponding end then the code works as it should. If I put them back in > it fails. > > The script itself sequentially loads files in groups and averages the data > within before saving the averaged data to a new file. > > Julia 0.2.1 > Windows 7 64-bit > *Packages Used* > > - DataFrames > - Datetime (I know, Dates exists but I haven't had time to make the > update) > > >
