Would it be possible and/or worthwhile to allow indexing with dropped 
singleton dimensions with a period modified.

eg
a[1,:,:] works as now, returns an Array with 3 dimensions
a.[1,:,:] returns an Array with 2 dimensions

It sort of fits into the use of . as a modifier to represent broadcasting. 

On Wednesday, September 3, 2014 6:31:31 AM UTC-6, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>
> It depends on what you mean. If you mean non-copying slices, then yes. If 
> you mean that all singleton slices are dropped, then that seems less likely.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Neal Becker <ndbe...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> I hope the goal is for slicing to work like numpy.
>>
>> Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>>
>> > No, this is a pretty contentious issue. A lot of the relevant 
>> discussion is
>> > in #4774 <https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/4774>. The one 
>> thing
>> > everyone agrees on which is going to happen in 0.4 for sure is that 
>> slicing
>> > will generally create views into the original array rather than copying 
>> the
>> > data.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Christoph Ortner
>> > <christop...@gmail.com <javascript:>
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 19:12:01 UTC+1, Stefan Karpinski wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Are slices in Julia any worse than in Matlab? If so, what does Matlab 
>> do
>> >>> that's better? I agree that our current slicing needs improvements 
>> (they
>> >>> are planned), but it is largely due to its Matlab heritage.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I did not mean to apply that Julia is worse in this respect. Off the 
>> cuff,
>> >> I would say slicing is no better or worse than in matlab. And, for the
>> >> record, slicing multi-dimensional arrays in Matlab has been driving me 
>> mad
>> >> for some quite some time.
>> >>
>> >> I've skimmed the discussions in the "issues" lists on github, and I 
>> very
>> >> much liked the idea of  distinguishing
>> >>     a[i:i, :, :]
>> >> from
>> >>     a[i, :, :]
>> >> until I remembered that I want
>> >>     a[i,:]
>> >> to be a row-vector.  But I can't have the cake and eat it too.
>> >>
>> >> Is there a consensus yet what the final slicing behaviour will be?
>> >>
>> >> --Christoph
>> >>
>> >>
>> --
>> -- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to