With a sufficiently compelling argument, I imagine it might be conceivable--- there are other equally-fundamental decisions that are viewed as being in-play during the 0.4 series. You might start by disabling that behavior and then seeing what aspects, if any, of `make testall` break.
But as an argument for change, "cripes!" doesn't cut it :-). --Tim On Sunday, September 07, 2014 12:16:19 PM [email protected] wrote: > Thanks for the response. > > > It's both less bad and weirder than that. Integers are iterable. > > Cripes! I've found the relevant mailing list thread you mentioned: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/julia-users/bNDcBnF5hd0/q2GL2UtbmVIJ > . Stefan mentions this decision could be revisited, so I'm hopeful this > will eventually change. Julia isn't yet at a stage where backwards > compatibility is critical, I presume?
