On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 11:50:44 AM UTC-5, Steven G. Johnson wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:20:59 PM UTC-4, Gray Calhoun wrote: >> >> Are there better ways to do this in general? >> > > For this kind of expression-matching code, you may find the Match.jl > package handy (https://github.com/kmsquire/Match.jl), to get ML- or > Scala-like symbolic pattern-matching. >
Thanks, that's pretty cool. For simple cases like I'm using, do you know if there are advantages (or disadvantages) to using Match.jl, or should I just view it as a nicer syntax? (Obviously, when things get more complicated Match.jl looks very appealing).
