FunctionalCollections.jl actually implements an immutable array type. I haven't looked at it recently, so I don't know it's current status.
Cheers, Kevin On Monday, September 15, 2014, Steven G. Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:04:20 PM UTC-4, Yakir Gagnon wrote: >> >> My original intention was to ask if there was any way we could declare a >> const array who's elements are also constants. >> > > Right now, the only way to do this is if you declare a new AbstractArray > subtype, call it ReadOnlyArray, that has getindex but not setindex! > methods. >
