Thanks to this discussion, I have added some performance related lint messages related to type declaration. It would catch dimension-less array field type going forward.
On Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:10:51 PM UTC+7, Zac wrote: > > Great! It seems it was the lack of array dimensions on the type > specification that was causing the slowdown. W/ a bit of further fiddling > I've gotten it down to 2x C speed and now just have to work out a way to > parallelise it effectively >
