No worries. We've all been there :-)
> On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Jürgen Bohnert <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm terribly sorry. After checking another time I found a typo in my original > wrapper-function that was responsible. The performance was not a problem at > all but my wrapper-function was doing twice the work due to my own stupidity. > > Thank you for the replies any way. People seem to be nice around here. > Best, > J. > > Am Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2014 23:14:18 UTC+2 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat: >> >>> Le jeudi 02 octobre 2014 à 13:51 -0700, Jürgen Bohnert a écrit : >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'm new to using julia and I would be grateful if anyone could shed some >>> light on the following performance-issue that I cannot explain. >>> For some reason wrapping 2 for-loops into a separate function and then >>> calling that function is 2 times slower than executing the for-loops >>> ...... >>> the process ends up taking twice the time of the 'loops_simple' case. Can >>> anyone explain what I'm doing wrong? >> I think you're going to get many replies if you manage to post a short >> reproducible example somewhere, e.g. in a GitHub gist. It's hard to tell >> what's happening without seeing a concrete piece of code in action. >> >> >> Regards >> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> I'm running julia Version 0.4.0-dev+584; Commit 114abf4; x86_64-linux-gnu >>> >>
